Part IIId refers to St. Emilion and Pomerol. Here are our notes:

2004 Château Angélus, St. Emilion

Appearance: deep purple.

Nose: very ripe black and red fruits with complex savoury quality (oak, spice, pencil shavings etc.). Lovely oak in particular.

Palate: marked ripe fruit, excellent medium chewy tannins, fine medium acidity and impressive concentration for the 2004 vintage. Superb length.

Conclusion: 50% Merlot, 47% Cabernet Franc and 3% Cabernet Sauvignon, this wine spends somewhere between 18-22 months in new oak. It certainly has the fruit to withstand that kind of treatment. This was extremely good, although we’re not sure many would be willing to fork out for Angélus.

Rating: 18.5/20 [possible 19/20]

2004 Château Canon-la-Gaffelière, St. Emilion

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: delicate nose with ripe red and black fruits. Not too extracted. Good oak.

Palate: well put together, featuring good fruit, nice closely-knit medium tannins, good acidity and encouraging length.

Conclusion: 55% merlot, 40% Cabernet Franc, 5% Cabernet Sauvignon, anything like 80-100% of the wine can see new oak for various periods depending on the vintage. Stephan von Neipperg was very informative, explaining that for this wine he has at his disposal particularly old Cabernet Franc (including vines that survived a significant frost in 1956).

Rating: 18/20

2004 Clos Fourtet, St. Emilion

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: mineral, metallic first nose with ripe fruit coming in later. Non-intrusive oak.

Palate: nice acidity here, ripe medium tannins. Well-integrated.

Conclusion: 85% Merlot, 10% Cabernet Sauvignon, 5% Cabernet Franc, the wine sees 80% new oak for an unspecified period. This was well-made.

Rating: 17.5/20

2004 Château Figeac, St. Emilion

Appearance: darkish purple-red.

Nose: lovely ripe dark fruits (blackcurrant, blackberry, black plum) with good oak.

Palate: more high-quality dark fruits, but angular and with bigger tannins than expected. Concentrated, with good length.

Conclusion: 35% Cabernet Sauvignon, 35% Cabernet Franc and 30% Merlot, this wine sees 100% new oak. It’s impressive and seemed to have good concentration.

Rating: 18/20

2004 Château Grand Mayne, St. Emilion

Appearance: medium purple.

Nose: delicate berry fruits, then greater red and black plum fruit coming through. Integrated oak.

Palate: good fruit, ripe tannins which are larger than expected and take a while to come through. Good length here too.

Conclusion: 75% Merlot, 15% Cabernet Franc, 10% Cabernet Sauvignon, the wine spends between 14-18 months in 80% new oak. Good stuff.

Rating: 17.5/20

2004 Château Troplong Mondot, St. Emilion

Appearance: deep purple-red.

Nose: dark fruits, leather and tobacco (from the oak).

Palate: large chunky tannins with decent acidity and excellent fruit. Good length.

Conclusion: 80% Merlot, 10% Cabernet Franc, 10% Cabernet Sauvignon, the wine spends up to a year in 70% new oak and then a further year in old barrels. It is very young at present, but could be very impressive with significant ageing.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Clinet, Pomerol

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: tight first nose, metallic. Seems closed right now.

Palate: again more tight fruit and seems too young to assess at the moment (perhaps this bottle is atypical).

Conclusion: 80% Merlot, 15% Cabernet Franc, 5% Cabernet Sauvignon, this wine sees new oak for an unspecified period. But this bottle was too closed to give an initial response really.

Rating: tentative 17.5/20

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

The Union des Grand Crus de Bordeaux held their annual grand tasting in Beijing, the last in a leg of an Asia-wide tour also comprising Tokyo (22nd Nov), Osaka (24th Nov), Seoul (26th Nov), Shanghai (28th Nov) and Guangzhou (29th Nov).

Many chateaux owners were then going on to Singapore and India, en route back to France. Several commented that the turn-out at Beijing’s Sofitel Hotel was better than in previous years; and were happy both with the volume here as well as in Shanghai and Guangzhou in particular. We spoke with several owners about their perceptions of the China and wider Asia markets and although no single property has obvious ‘brand’ recognition within China – apart, perhaps, from Château Lafite – they were cautiously optimistic about the future in Beijing and further a field.

This year the UGC showcased the 2004 vintage, still under-appreciated and under-valued, at least alongside 2000 and 2005. The hype surrounding 2003 may still exist, but most people should recognize the vintage had atypical weather conditions that resulted in some strange wines from some quarters as well as over-activity in the market. Recall 1997: different weather conditions, but similar hype. The 1997s drunk much sooner than some expected; clearly a different vintage from the likes of 1995 and 1996.

With so many wines to taste, the notes we offer here are condensed, beginning with dry whites (Part I), then the sweeter ones (Part II) - the Sauternes and Barsac wines were particularly strong - followed by reds from the various appellations (Part III).

Here are the notes for Part II: Sauternes and Barsac

2004 Château Climens, Barsac

Appearance: medium gold colour.

Nose: complex and restrained nose of light candied fruits, honey and a sensitive level of botrytis.
Palate: excellent acidity, medium body, good fruit, good botrytis and delicate all round. Only medium-sweet (it’s worth remembering that most Barsac and Sauternes wines are not actually that sweet relative to other ‘sweet wines’).

Conclusion: 100% Semillon, this shows the quality and finesse you would expect from Climens. Needs time, but is unlikely to be a vintage for the long, long haul. The quality is very high, however. Is exposed to 60% new oak, but you wouldn’t know it.

Rating: 18/20 [but should get better]

2004 Château Coutet, Barsac

Appearance: bright medium gold.

Nose: complex nose of dried fruits, honey and with excellent botrytis.

Palate: very good acidity, lovely concentration here and a great balance between residual sugar and acidity. Integrated.

Conclusion: 75% Semillon, 23% Sauvignon Blanc and 2% Muscadelle, a good showing from Coutet, even although many of the Sauternes and Barsac wines seemed to be showing better than many of the red Bordeaux. Should repay cellaring well. Sees 100% new oak, but we’re not sure for how long.

Rating: 18/20 [but may improve]

2004 Château Doisy Daëne, Barsac

Appearance: deepish orange gold.

Nose: very concentrated nose with lovely fruit, lots of botrytis (which is well-integrated) and some spicy notes.

Palate: rich, great acidity here, very good length and lovely fruit. There’s an excellent balance of residual sugar to acidity too.

Conclusion: we’re big fans of Doisy Daëne having enjoyed a number of different vintages (particularly the 1988 and 1990 wines). 80% Semillon and the remainder Sauvignon Blanc: this was very good and should age very well too. Spends 18 months in oak, of which one third is new. Our favourite of the Sauternes and Barsac wines represented at this tasting.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Guiraud, Sauternes

Appearance: deep gold.

Nose: slightly musty first nose, although this dissipates. Rich fruit that seems caramelized and with considerable botrytis.

Palate: large style, quite a bit of oak on this wine and somewhat closed at present.

Conclusion: hard to judge right now. Guiraud tends to produce wines in a fatter style and the relatively high amount of Sauvignon Blanc (35% to 65% Semillon) makes for a different expression too. Perhaps this particular bottle was not showing so well. Spends 18 months in 80% new oak.

Rating: 17/20

2004 Château La Tour Blanche, Sauternes

Appearance: medium gold.

Nose: delicately honeyed nose, integrated light botrytis.

Palate: beautiful balance of acidity to sugar here with good fruit, good length and in a more savoury style than some of the other Barsac and Sauternes wines.

Conclusion: this is 84% Semillon, 10% Sauvignon Blanc and 6% Muscadelle. The wine is exposed to 100% new oak, but we couldn’t find out for how long. Clearly very high quality. Along with the Doisy Daëne, one of the best wines here with the Lafaurie-Peyraguey also a strong contender.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Lafaurie-Peyraguey, Sauternes

Appearance: medium to deepish gold.

Nose: very honeyed and candied fruit with less overt botrytis than on some of the other wines.

Palate: well-balanced, lively acidity which is well-integrated with the residual sugar here. Good fruit and very good length.

Conclusion: this is 90% Semillon, 8% Sauvignon Blanc and 2% Muscadelle. 30% of the wine sees new oak. This is clearly one of the stronger wines of the vintage – at least those represented at this tasting.

Rating: 18/20 [but could be higher]

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

The Union des Grand Crus de Bordeaux held their annual grand tasting in Beijing, the last in a leg of an Asia-wide tour also comprising Tokyo (22nd Nov), Osaka (24th Nov), Seoul (26th Nov), Shanghai (28th Nov) and Guangzhou (29th Nov).

We have already posted our notes on the dry and sweeter whites (see Featured Tasting: Union des Grand Crus de Bordeaux in Beijing, Parts I and II). Here is the beginning of Part III which is devoted to the reds in all their different appellations. In fact, we have had to subdivide our posts into Part IIIa-d to cover everything we tasted (see below).

Tasting multiple samples of young red Bordeaux effectively takes stamina and experience. High-end red Bordeaux made in a traditional style should keep for decades; along with Vintage Port and some German Rieslings, these are wines that can have considerable longevity and often have to be left for some time to show their complexity and subtlety.

The only thing harder than assessing extremely young wines destined for a long life is barrel-tasting of unfinished wines (i.e. those still undergoing fermentation). This is something we’ve done in Burgundy, but not in Bordeaux; although we did once get to taste barrel samples of the 2003 Ports (the fermentation may have been stopped with brandy, but it was precisely the brandy and powerful young fruit that made for hard work!).

But what about the 2004 reds? Generally speaking, the 2004 vintage is not as concentrated as years like 2005, 2000 and 1990, although it will obviously have ageing-potential (much more of a ‘classic’ year than the atypical 2003). To cope with the number of wines, our notes are necessarily condensed. They should also be seen as provisional. Although we have tasted significant numbers of wines at various competitions and wine challenges before, it is always best to re-taste wines that promise significant evolution (there’s also the bottle variation that will naturally occur, even with top wines). Despite these provisos, 2004 can we seen as a reliable vintage for the medium term, although some wines will go for much longer.

We have arranged our notes around each Bordeaux appellation and grouped them into a series of posts:

Part IIIa: Pessac-Léognan and Margaux

Part IIIb: St. Julien

Part IIIc: Pauillac, St. Estèphe, Haut-Médoc and Moulis-en-Médoc

Part IIId: St. Emilion and Pomerol

Sadly, there was not much of a presence for St. Estèphe at the Beijing tasting and we didn’t get to taste as many Pauillacs or Pomerols as we wanted (despite what was on offer). In some cases, we made a point of not revisiting old favourites that have been established as good value (e.g. Châteaux Batailley, Angludet, Talbot), but couldn’t resist sampling Léoville and Langoa Barton.

Part IIIa: Pessac-Léognan and Margaux

2004 Domaine de Chevalier, Pessac-Léognan

Appearance: deepish purple-red.

Nose: lovely fruit, good oak, very attractive nose.

Palate: excellent concentration for the vintage, lovely tannins, strong fruit and impressive length.

Conclusion: 50% Merlot and 50% Cabernet Sauvignon, this wine spent some 21 months in oak (50% of which was new). It has the fruit and structure to age gracefully. Lovely Pessac.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Pape Clément, Pessac-Léognan

Appearance: medium-dark purple-red.

Nose: pleasant fruit, good use of oak here and good concentration.

Palate: big, chewy tannins, good acidity and decent length. The fruit has decent concentration too.

Conclusion: 60% Cabernet Sauvignon and 40% Merlot, this wine usually spends around 18-22 months in barrel (100% new oak). Another impressive Pessac. Has a different tannic structure from the Domaine de Chevalier; but both have their charms and should age well.

Rating: 18/20

2004 Château Giscours, Margaux

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: beautiful savoury nose with red and black fruits and even some mineral notes. Non-intrusive oak.

Palate: lovely semi-chewy medium tannins, vibrant acidity and more ‘minerality’. Good fruit and impressive length.

Conclusion: 55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 40% Merlot and the remaining 5% a mixture of Cabernet Franc and Petit Verdot, this wine spends some 15-18 months in oak (50% new). This is very stylish Margaux with a considerable future ahead of it.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château du Terte, Margaux

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: very attractive black fruits with some spice and green pepper notes (there’s more Cabernet Franc and marginally more Petit Verdot than on the Ch. Giscours). Good use of oak.

Palate: decent structure, good acidity, pleasant fruit and good length with chunkier tannins than the Giscours.

Conclusion: 40% Cabernet Sauvignon, 35% Merlot, 20% Cabernet Franc and 5% Petit Verdot, this wine spends similar time in oak to the Ch. Giscours (they come from the same stable under General Manager, Alexander Van Beek). This is clearly very good, but the Giscours is better in this vintage.

Rating: 18/20

2004 Château Dufort-Vivens, Margaux

Appearance: deep purple-red.

Nose: stalky first nose, but this gives way to dark fruits and subtle oak.

Palate: nice acidity, ripe chunky tannins, good fruit and promising length.

Conclusion: 70% Cabernet Sauvignon, 24% Merlot and 6% Cabernet Franc, this wine sees some 16-20 months in oak (ranging from 35-45% new, depending on vintage). There’s more Cabernet Sauvignon here than on most Margaux – in fact Dufort-Vivens actually decided to graft some Cabernet Sauvignon on to some of their old Merlot vines. This gives a bigger Margaux.

Rating: 18/20

2004 Château Kirwan, Margaux

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: toasty first nose, mineral notes, but also lovely fruit coming through. Complex.

Palate: gripping, ripe medium tannins, excellent fruit, good acidity and more harmonious on palate than on nose at present.

Conclusion: 40% Cabernet Sauvignon, 30% Merlot, 20% Cabernet Franc and 10% Petit Verdot, this wine saw about 35% new oak, but we’re not sure for how long. What is clear is that Kirwan is in very good shape with the 2004 vintage. Very good Margaux.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Lascombes, Margaux

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: plenty of oak, but there is more than ample fruit coming through here as well. Some spice and has a lot to give yet.

Palate: big chunky tannins, large structure, good fruit, pleasant acidity and decent length.

Conclusion: 50% Merlot, 45% Cabernet Sauvignon and 5% Petit Verdot, this wine varies in treatment but does get to see a lot of new oak (usually 80-100%). However, there is more than enough fruit to match. This Margaux is in the larger style also favoured by Dufort-Vivens. Needs time.

Rating: 18/20

Of this group, Domaine de Chevalier, Giscours and Kirwan particularly stood out. But there were some good all round 2004s here.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Part IIIc of our tasting notes to the Union des Grand Crus de Bordeaux grand tasting refers to the appellations of Pauillac, St. Estèphe, Haut-Médoc and Moulis-en-Médoc. We were not able to taste all the wines on show, but hope the below will prove useful for those interested in this underrated vintage.

2004 Château Pontet-Canet, Pauillac

Appearance: deep purple colour.

Nose: very attractive black fruits (blackcurrant, blackberry, some black plum) matched by non-intrusive oak. Concentrated and fragrant.

Palate: strong on fruit, large chewy tannins, excellent acidity, good concentration and good length.

Conclusion: 60% Cabernet Sauvignon, 33% Merlot, 5% Cabernet Franc and 2% Petit Verdot, this wine spends 12 months in 60% new oak. It is robust and very well-made Pauillac. Should age very well.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Lynch-Bages, Pauillac

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: ‘sweet and savoury’ first nose showing lovely blackcurrant fruit with moderately toasty oak.

Palate: lovely concentration and ripe, chewy tannins. More attractive fruit and oak here with good length.

Conclusion: 73% Cabernet Sauvignon, 10% Cabernet Franc, 15% merlot and 2% Petit Verdot, this wine spends some 15 months in barrel (not sure what percentage is new oak). Whatever the case, this is an attractive and well-made Pauillac.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Cos Labory, St. Estèphe

Appearance: dark purple.

Nose: very blackcurrant with strong intense fruit, non-intrusive oak and savoury notes.

Palate: concentrated, nice tannins, strong fruit and quite good length.

Conclusion: 60% Cabernet Sauvignon, 35% Merlot and 5% Cabernet Franc, this has some of the intensity of St. Estèphe without being ‘rustic’. The wine is exposed to 45% new oak, although we’re not sure for how long. Good.

Rating: 17.5/20

2004 Château La Lagune, Haut-Médoc

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: attractive red and black fruits (blackcurrant, blackberry, red plum) with distinct spicy notes (from oak and Petit Verdot). Good oak.

Palate: well-balanced palate with good fruit, fine acidity, medium slightly chewy tannins and impressive length. Not intense, but delicate.

Conclusion: 60% Cabernet Sauvignon, 30% Merlot, 10% Petit Verdot, this wine spends 18 months in oak (50% new) and is clearly of high quality. The percentage of Petit Verdot adds some complexity to the fine fruit. Should age very well.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Cantemerle, Haut-Médoc

Appearance: medium purple.

Nose: immediately appealing savoury, fruity and slightly ‘animal’ nose. Good oak.

Palate: nice concentration, ripe chunky tannins with good balance and good length.

Conclusion: 52% Cabernet Sauvignon, 40% Merlot, 5% Petit Verdot and 3% Cabernet Franc, this is a reliable and well-made Haut-Médoc. Cantemerle is good value.

Rating: 17.5/20 [could be higher with time]

2004 Château Chasse-Spleen, Moulis-en-Médoc

Appearance: medium purple.

Nose: savoury and slight green first nose, but the fruit comes through as ripe and attractive. Nice oak.

Palate: good concentration – there’s certainly no hole in the middle here – with nice tannins, decent acidity and pleasant fruit. Good.

Conclusion: 60% Cabernet Sauvignon, 35% Merlot and 5% Petit Verdot, this wine will have spent something like 14-18 months in barrel (40% new oak). Reliable and well-made.

Rating: 17.5/20

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

The Union des Grand Crus de Bordeaux held their annual grand tasting in Beijing, the last in a leg of an Asia-wide tour also comprising Tokyo (22nd Nov), Osaka (24th Nov), Seoul (26th Nov), Shanghai (28th Nov) and Guangzhou (29th Nov).

Many chateaux owners were then going on to Singapore and India, en route back to France. Several commented that the turn-out at Beijing’s Sofitel Hotel was better than in previous years; and were happy both with the volume here as well as in Shanghai and Guangzhou in particular. We spoke with several owners about their perceptions of the China and wider Asia markets and although no single property has obvious ‘brand’ recognition within China – apart, perhaps, from Château Lafite – they were cautiously optimistic about the future in Beijing and further a field.

This year the UGC showcased the 2004 vintage, still under-appreciated and under-valued, at least alongside 2000 and 2005. The hype surrounding 2003 may still exist, but most people should recognize the vintage had atypical weather conditions that resulted in some strange wines from some quarters as well as over-activity in the market. Recall 1997: different weather conditions, but similar hype. The 1997s drunk much sooner than some expected; clearly a different vintage from the likes of 1995 and 1996.

With so many wines to taste, the notes we offer here are condensed, beginning with dry whites (Part I), then the sweeter ones (Part II) - the Sauternes and Barsac wines were particularly strong - followed by reds from the various appellations (Part III).

2004 Domaine de Chevalier (Blanc), Péssac-Leognan

Appearance: medium green gold.

Nose: attractive nose with marked Sauvignon notes – here slightly aromatic and peachy (not the clone that is used in Sancerre or for other Sauvignons in the Loire Valley) – but with lemon and slight wax coming through from the Semillon. Good use of oak.

Palate: integrated fruit, fresh acidity, good length and pleasant oak. Not heavy. Elegant.

Conclusion: decent white Pessac, this wine is 70% Sauvignon Blanc and 30% Semillon and spends 18 months in oak (a third of which is new). Very good.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château La Louvière (Blanc), Pessac-Léognan

Appearance: medium green gold.

Nose: lovely oak which is currently predominant backed by citrus (the fruit should come out later).

Palate: very balanced, considerable toasty oak, but the fruit is there with very good acidity.

Conclusion: this wine is 85% Sauvignon Blanc and 15% Semillon and is a lovely example of dry white Bordeaux.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Malartic-Lagravière (Blanc), Pessac-Léognan

Appearance: lightish green-gold.

Nose: made in a light savoury style with some green notes but also peach from the Sauvignon Blanc. Oak is non-intrusive.

Palate: good acidity, with light apple and peach fruit. Quite good length.

Conclusion: a blend of 80% Sauvignon Blanc and 20% Semillon, this much more of an aperitif dry white Bordeaux than a so-called ‘first course wine’, but some may like the light style and the fact the oaking is on the light side here too.

Rating: 17/20

2004 Château Olivier (Blanc), Pessac-Léognan

Appearance: medium green-gold.

Nose: nice intensity of lemon fruit here with good oak and even some minerality.

Palate: good fruit, nice acidity and good length. Oak is balanced.

Conclusion: this spends 10 months in oak (of which 20% is new) and is well put together. Should age well too.

Rating: 17.5/20

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Here are our tasting notes for the 30th November 2007 Union des Grand Crus de Bordeaux tasting in Beijing Part IIIb which comprises the appellation of St. Julien.

Please see other posts for other appellations/communes and an overview of the 2004 vintage for dry whites (Part I), sweet whites (Part II) and reds (Part IIIa-d).

2004 Château Langoa Barton, St. Julien

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: very fragrant first nose with lovely blackcurrant fruit and excellent oak.

Palate: ripe medium-high chewy tannins (these seem larger on this wine than on the Léoville Barton at present – see below); excellent fruit, good acidity and well-balanced throughout.

Conclusion: 70% Cabernet Sauvignon, 20% Merlot and 10% Cabernet Franc, this wine spends 20 months in barrel (in 50% new oak). It’s very stylish and has some of the robustness of St. Julien showing through.

Rating: 18.5/20

2004 Château Léoville Barton, St. Julien

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: classic blackcurrant nose with ‘pencil-shaving’ oak and some mineral or metallic notes. Complex.

Palate: lovely ripe medium tannins (structure is unexpectedly lighter than the Langoa, at least on this bottle) with good fruit, pleasant acidity and impressive length.

Conclusion: 72% Cabernet Sauvignon, 20% Merlot and 8% Cabernet Franc, this undergoes very similar treatment to Langoa Barton. Although this vintage is lighter than the likes of more concentrated years (e.g. 1990, 2000, 2005), it has great finesse. The Langoa Barton just had the edge in quality, at least in these bottles.

Rating: 18/20

2004 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien

Appearance: medium purple.

Nose: intense blackcurrant and black plum nose, good oak.

Palate: chunky and spiky medium-high tannins, nice acidity and good fruit. Pretty good length.

Conclusion: 63% Cabernet Sauvignon, 27% Merlot, 8% Petit Verdot and 2% Cabernet Franc, this wines is exposed to 75% new oak (although we’re not sure for how long). Good quality St. Julien and increasingly less in the shadow of Léoville and Langoa Barton.

Rating: 17.5/20

2004 Château Beychevelle, St. Julien

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: has the overt blackcurrant fruitiness of St. Julien balanced by nice oak here.

Palate: rich palate, good fruit, ripe and chewy tannins, good length.

Conclusion: 62% Cabernet Sauvignon, 31% Merlot, 5% Cabernet Franc, 2% Petit Verdot, this wine spends some 18 months in 50% new oak. This seemed a reliable expression, up to Beychevelle’s quality certainly.

Rating: 17.5/20

2004 Château Branaire-Ducru, St. Julien

Appearance: medium purple-red.

Nose: very savoury first nose in which oak is more dominant than fruit at present. But the fruit is there.

Palate: toasty oak, nice acidity, rounded and very savoury.

Conclusion: 70% Cabernet Sauvignon, 22% Merlot, 5% Cabernet Franc and 3% Petit Verdot, this is a savoury and well-made expression of St. Julien. Good.

Rating: 17.5/20

2004 Château Gruaud Larose, St. Julien

Appearance: dark purple.

Nose: lovely black fruits, leather and floral notes including some spiciness (clove, cinnamon) mostly derived from the oak here (but the Petit Verdot probably also makes a difference).

Palate: gripping large tannins (chewy in texture), good acidity, strong fruit and impressive length.

Conclusion: 57% Cabernet Sauvignon, 30% Merlot, 7% Cabernet Franc, 4% Petit Verdot and 2% Malbec, this wine spends 18 months in barrel (40% new oak) and was generally very impressive. Well worth keeping.

Rating: 18/20

2004 Château Lagrange, St. Julien

Appearance: medium purple.

Nose: very fragrant nose featuring toasty oak with some green notes to the black fruit (not unripe, merely aromatic).

Palate: light fruits, nice medium chewy tannins, toasty oak and delicate. Quite good length.

Conclusion: 66% Cabernet Sauvignon, 27% Merlot and 7% Petit Verdot, this is a delicate St. Julien.

Rating: 17.5/20

Clearly, the stand-out wines here were Léoville and Langoa Barton as well as Gruaud Larose. But it will be interesting to see how the others develop.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Here are the rest of the wines from the Antinori tasting organized by Summergate and hosted by the Italian Ambassador, Mrs Riccardo Sessa and Alessia Antinori. Wines were available from Umbria and Tuscany, the original Antinori home (see separate posting for the three whites on show and the Umbrian and Tuscan wines we tasted) as well as Piemonte (Prunotto) and Puglia (Tormaresca), both also under Antinori control.

2005 Dolcetto d’Alba, Prunotto

Appearance: deepish purple colour, clear rim.

Nose: lots of red and black cherry but with noticeable almond nose and some white pepper. No oak.

Palate: chewy medium tannins (well managed here for Dolcetto!), medium-high refreshing acidity, lovely fruit and impressive length. Alcohol is well-balanced too.

Conclusion: a lovely example of Dolcetto from a strong vintage. Retail 203RMB.

Rating: 18/20

2005 Barbera d’Asti ‘Fiulot’ Vineyard, Prunotto

Appearance: medium red-purple, clear rim.

Nose: light red cherry nose with some stalky fruit. Some other savoury smells, but no oak.

Palate: bright fruit, nice acidity, and moderate spiky tannins. Quite good length.

Conclusion: medium-range Barbera in a light style. Well-made. Retail 179RMB.

Rating: 17/20

2000 Barbera d’Asti ‘Costamiole’ Vineyard, Prunotto

Appearance: dark purple-red, slight orange rim.

Nose: complex nose with intense black cherry fruit and several different savoury aromas including herbs (rosemary, oregano). Some of the spice here must be traceable to oak.

Palate: very ripe chewy tannins, great acidity and fantastic complexity of fruit and oak. Well-balanced throughout.

Conclusion: part of the Prunotto ‘Cru’ range and a superb Barbera! The wine does actually spend 12 months in barriques and is then aged for a year in bottle before release. Retail 660RMB.

Rating: 18.5/20

2001 Barolo ‘Bussia’ Vineyard, Prunotto

Appearance: medium to dark purple-red, slight orange rim.

Nose: immensely perfumed Nebbiolo with a mixture of black cherry and redcurrant fruit, peppermint and florality (although what flowers we couldn’t tell you!). Oak is well-integrated here as the grape variety is allowed to sing.

Palate: seems tighter in flavour on the palate (this is not a function of the gripping tannins as such). Very good length, however.

Conclusion: obviously high-class Barolo from a really good year that has an impressive life ahead. The ‘Bussia’ vineyard is in Monforte. The wine is aged in large French oak barrels, then in smaller barriques before being aged for a further year in bottle. Approx. 839RMB retail.

Rating: 18.5/20 [might be higher with time]

The Puglian reds from Tormaresca:

2004 Rosso Puglia IGT, Tormaresca

Appearance: medium red, clear rim.

Nose: attractive red and black cherry fruit, ‘warm’ and quite alcoholic on the nose. ‘Rustic’ in a good sense.

Palate: chewy and spiky medium tannins, refreshing acidity, pleasant fruit, quite good length.

Conclusion: 70% Negroamaro and 30% Cabernet Sauvignon, this is an attractive blend for everyday drinking. Retail 167RMB.

Rating: 16.5/20

2003 ‘Masseria Maime’ Salento IGT, Tormaresca

Appearance: medium purple-red, clear rim.

Nose: ‘crushed berries’ with leathery notes, also savoury and, again, ‘rustic’, although that needs qualifying. There’s an alcoholic quality to the nose, probably helped by the 2003 heat. This is attractive though.

Palate: nice ripe tannins, pleasant fruit, decent acidity and a good overall balance despite the ‘warm’ alcohol nose. Good length.

Conclusion: 100% Negroamaro and very drinkable. Impressive. Retail 419RMB.

Rating: 17.5/20

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

A grand tasting of the various properties owned by the Antinori family organized by Summergate and hosted by the Italian Ambassador, Mrs Riccardo Sessa and Alessia Antinori. Wines were available from Umbria and Tuscany (the original Antinori home) as well as Piemonte (Prunotto) and Puglia (Tormaresca), both also under Antinori control.

The tasting itself was held in the Italian Embassy and drew a good crowd of invited guests from the diplomatic, journalistic, F&B and wine trade worlds. The majority of the wines were red with only three whites on show. We offer our notes here of those three whites together with the rest of the selections from Umbria and Tuscany. A further post will contain the wines from Piemonte and the Puglian reds.

2005 Castello della Sala ‘Campogrande’ Orvieto Classico, Umbria

Appearance: pale green with yellow tints.

Nose: largely light apple fruit.

Palate: apple fruit, pleasant acidity, light-bodied, not bad length.

Conclusion: made from 40% Procanico, 40% Grechetto, 15% Verdello, 5% Drupeggio and Malvasia, this is a crisp, food-friendly white for everyday drinking and affordable at 135RMB.

Rating: 15.5/20

2005 Castello della Sala ‘Bramito del Cervo’ Chardonnay, Umbria IGT

Appearance: medium gold.

Nose: peach and melon fruit, pleasant oak.

Palate: good fruit, some acidity here; good oak and quite good length.

Conclusion: after maceration, the must for this wine is exposed to French Allier and Troncais barriques to undergo alcoholic fermentation; but only a proportion of the wine receives malolactic fermentation in wood. This may account for the lifting acidity here. Quite well put together. Price 299RMB.

Rating: 16/20

2004 Tormaresca ‘Pietra Bianca’ Castel del Monte Chardonnay, Puglia

Appearance: medium yellow-gold.

Nose: appealing citrus and peach fruit, good oak.

Palate: pleasant acidity, strong fruit, deft use of oak and well-balanced.

Conclusion: this was probably the best white of the three on show. Well-made Chardonnay with an impressive balance of ripe fruit – no trouble ripening Chardonnay in Puglia – and good acidity (probably the element that is harder to achieve). This wine retails at 347RMB.

Rating: 16.5/20

2004 La Braccesca ‘Sabazio’ Rosso di Montepulciano DOC, Tuscany

Appearance: light to medium red-purple, clear rim.

Nose: appealing light red fruits (red cherry, redcurrant).

Palate: more pleasant red fruits, medium-bodied, good acidity, light on tannin.

Conclusion: this wine is a blend of 80% Prugnolo Gentile, 15% Merlot and 5% Canaiolo (NB Montepulciano grapes are not used to make this wine, nor are they used for Vino Nobile di Montelpulciano – if you want to drink Montepulciano, try Montepulciano d’Abruzzo from the Marches region). It only spends about 4 months in oak which might account for why we didn’t notice any oak here at first. Priced at 191RMB, this is an easy-drinking, food-friendly Italian red for more or less immediate consumption.

Rating: 16/20

2001 La Braccesca Vino Nobile di Montepulciano DOCG, Tuscany

Appearance: deep purple colour with slightly orange rim.

Nose: dark black and red cherry fruit, ‘tart’ nose, discernible oak but this is well-integrated.

Palate: lovely tannins here (moderate and spiky in nature), fine acidity, pleasant dark cherry fruit and good length.

Conclusion: this wine is aged in different sizes of oak barrel for 12 months (with a proportion in barriques). It’s lovely stuff. 347RMB from Summergate.

Rating: 17.5/20

2001 ‘Marchese Antinori’ Chianti Classico Riserva DOCG, Tuscany

Appearance: dark purple, slightly orange rim.

Nose: marked black cherry fruit, savoury oak, slight spice, complex.

Palate: medium-high chewy tannins, lovely acidity, strong fruit, good oak and very good length.

Conclusion: a blend of 90% Sangiovese and 10% Cabernet Sauvignon, the latter adding some richness and slightly darker fruit whilst the former dominates with its strong cherry quality. The oak in question is new, one-year and two-year old Alliers and Troncais French oak and the wine spends some 14 months in oak after blending. 450RMB and clearly very good.

Rating: 18/20 [but could be higher with time]

2001 ‘Pian delle Vigne’ Brunello di Montalcino DOCG, Tuscany

Appearance: medium purple-red, slight orange rim.

Nose: complex red and black cherry fruit, some oak, savoury but with sweet fruits, complex.

Palate: very elegant with lovely closely knit but ripe medium-high tannins and beautiful Sangiovese fruit. Very balanced. Great length.

Conclusion: entirely Sangiovese, the wine spends some two years in a range of different sized oak vats and is also aged for a further year in bottle before release. This is clearly a very high quality Sangiovese (744RMB).

Rating: 18.5/20

Notes on the wines of Prunotto and the other Tormaresca reds to follow.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

2004 Elderton ‘Tantalus’ Shiraz Cabernet Malbec, Barossa

Appearance: dark purple red, clear rim.

Nose: sweet-smelling, ripe crushed red and black cherry, prune and blackberry, oak, vanilla and lots of cinnamon (American oak here). Gets more complex with aeration.

Palate: attractive ripe red and black fruits, medium silky tannins (very smooth), high alcohol, medium acidity, but all elements pretty well-balanced here. Pleasant length.

Conclusion: an intriguing blend – you don’t see much Malbec in Australian wines, apart from perhaps the odd Bordeaux-style blend, if then. Well-made and thoroughly drinkable (not for long ageing, but will improve in the next year or so). Well-priced for the Chinese market at 155RMB (from Summergate).

Rating: 17/20

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Gaia Gaja of famed Piemonte producer Angelo Gaja came to Beijing for a book-signing (at the Hilton Food & Wine Experience) and a special dinner arranged with importer ASC. She kindly consented to an email interview arranged around her busy schedule. Dragon Phoenix (hereafter DP) is very grateful to Gaia Gaja (hereafter GG) for her time and effort. With luck, she will be back in China in 2008.

DP: You recently visited Beijing to show-case your wines. What is your perception of the market for fine wines in China?

GG: The Chinese market is certainly one of the future, as China is a factor in all things: because of its growth and the increasing acquisition of wealth. Fine wine will undoubtedly be part of this expansion.

DP: How would you say Piemonte wines specifically are appreciated in China? Or is it too early for the market to understand the complexity of the Piemonte region?

GG: I believe our wines are accepted equally in China; just as all other fine wines in the world are. Their complexity is an added value which, with time, will be more and more appreciated.

DP: Your company has a number of business interests: including Gaja distribution, the Castello di Barbaresco as well as wine estates not just in Piemonte but also in Tuscany. How would you say your business experience has helped in establishing new markets for your wines in China and Asia as a whole?

GG: My mother has a little distribution company importing foreign wines to Italy (this is a business that concerns Italy alone). As to the Castello di Barbaresco, you are talking about the castle of Barbaresco which we bought in 1995 and restored. We were thinking of transforming it into a hotel but, in the end, we decided to keep it for the winery – so now there are offices and tasting rooms. So, we just make wine really. This is the only thing we know how to do and we will continue doing it just so.

We produce wine in Piemonte, in Montacino and in Bolgheri, as you know. The three wineries are working with different varieties: Nebbiolo, Sangiovese (in Montalcino), Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot (in Bolgheri). The three regions – what we call the ‘3 Bs’ of Italy, Barbaresco (and Barolo), Brunello and Bolgheri – are, in my opinion, the most prestigious in Italy. They provide the opportunity and real possibility of making long-ageing and complex wines. So, we have the same goal for the three wineries and the same style, but different expressions. The Chinese market can see the distinctive differences between these three wine regions with the distinctive Gaja flare in each case.

DP: Your family’s wine-making roots in Barbaresco date back to 1859 and Giovanni Gaja’s establishment of the winery. You have embraced both tradition and modern technology in your wine-making. How would you describe your company’s philosophy and outlook?

GG: My wines are easy recognizable in blind-tastings because they have a defined style that is obviously the style of our Barbaresco winery. The goal is to produce wines loyal to the area, and loyal to the history of the winery itself. To preserve their identity and dignity, we release them only in vintages when the weather conditions have allowed them to express all their beauties and to illustrate what Nebbiolo in Barbaresco can do.

The wines are, therefore, not produced every year. For example, our Piemonte winery did not produce any wine in 2002,1992,1984,1980 and 1972. The single vineyard wines (Costa Russi, Sori San Lorenzo, Sori Tildin, Sperss, Conteisa) were not even produced in 1994,1992 and in many other older vintages. Pieve Santa Restituta did not produce any wine in 2002 and in 2003; and Camarcanda was not produced in 2002 either.

To work like artisans, following every detail from the beginning to the end: this is our philosophy. We do not buy in grapes but only use what we produce from our estate vineyards which have been selected over several generations. We also personally select the wood for part of the barriques we use, and we are working on several other details in the winery too.

DP: Piemonte wines are very food-friendly. Do you believe your wines will pair well with different Chinese cuisines?

GG: I don’t know enough about Chinese food, but I had the pleasure to pair several of our wines with different Shanghai-ese dishes (which were more oily and generally sweeter to the taste than some of the other Chinese regional cuisines I’ve heard of). They paired extremely well.

DP: Angelo Gaja was the first wine-maker to use French barriques and introduce international grape varieties to the Langhe. How would you describe the difference between your ‘international’ wines and your Barbaresco DOCG or is there no difference in your wine-making philosophy for these wines?

GG: Even the international varieties that my father introduced and started to produce in Barbaresco (Cabernet Sauvignon, Sauvignon Blanc, Chardonnay) are producing wines (Darmagi, Alteni di Brassica and Gaia & Rey) that are very Piedmontese in their personality. The grape varieties are a vehicle to express the flavours of the place where they are grown. Piemonte wines reflect minerality, earthiness, and can have fabulous ageing potential where the aromas develop exquisitely. All of these characteristics are expressed in the Darmagi, Gaia & Rey and Alteni di Brassica wines.

DP: Some of your top Barbaresco wines – Sori Tildin, San Lorenzo, Costa Russi – and the Barolos, Sperss and Conteisa, are ‘de-classified’ to Langhe Nebbiolo DOC because this allows you to add up to 15% of other grapes. Do you find that blending helps tame some of the more difficult aspects of Nebbiolo, e.g. its sometimes harsh tannins? Or is there another reason for blending?

GG: My winery has produced Barbaresco since 1859. And this is why Barbaresco is the most representative wine from our winery. The single vineyard concept was introduced in the late 1960s (in 1967 we produced the first single vineyard Barbaresco: Sori San Lorenzo). Clearly, Gaja became well-known through this Barbaresco, the only wine of the winery for generations; and the reason behind the re-classification of the single vineyards was to go back to Barbaresco as the only Barbaresco of the winery.

When we changed the denomination for the single vineyards, we discovered the advantage of being able to add, if we wanted, other varieties. The variety we are most interested in adding (and from 1997 did so) is Barbera: a local variety with very good acidity, excellent fruit and not too much tannin. In warm vintages Barbera is useful because it gives the wine a certain drinkability whilst also aiding ageing-potential. It works very well with Nebbiolo.

DP: Do you think it is easier for consumers to understand international grapes – for example, you make straight a straight Chardonnay, Cabernet Sauvignon and a Sauvignon Blanc – than the complexities of Italy’s DOC and DOCG system? Or is the Piemonte region itself of more importance to you and your customers?

GG: I think that one important reason why the international varieties are more understandable is that they are more well-known than the DOCs or DOCGs. So people are more used to drinking them and knowing what to expect from them. These varieties are like an international language that everyone can, on some level, speak and understand.

In Italy we have such a large selection of local varieties, all produced in such tiny quantities and areas, that it becomes very difficult to know them well. They are very much niche products. The international varieties give the chance to wine lovers to compare the results of certain grapes coming from different wineries and from different parts of the world.

DP: Nicholas Belfrage MW has written about your pricing policy, observing that this ‘seems to be paying off handsomely, with international buyers willing to spend any sum for a top name’ (Barolo to Valpolicella: The Wines of Northern Italy, p. 86). Belfrage does not dispute the very high quality of your wines, but wonders about global prices in the fine wine market. Do you think that buyers will continue to pay ‘any sum’ for top wines?

GG: The markets are undeniably growing and the new increasing demand cannot be absorbed by the offer of certain wines alone (as some wines cannot be produced in sufficient quantities to meet the demand). At the same time the production of wine is growing all over the world as well as the quality level (more countries are producing wines of better quality). So, for sure, in the case of certain top wines the prices will inevitably continue to grow. Fortunately, though, there will also be a good offer of wines at more moderate prices.

DP: In China, wine education should improve the market for fine wines as consumers become more confident in purchasing. How do you hope to support the appreciation of your wines in the Chinese market(s)?

GG: I like to explain my wines personally (and be there to explain them in person). I like to meet the people that drink and talk about my wines; and to hear their questions. This is one of the pleasures of my work. I will continue to come to China, maybe more often than I have in the past, and continue to explain what my wines mean to me to the people I will have the pleasure to meet. This is central to my life and work.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.